Gas stove makers have a pollution solution. They’re just not using it


Gas utilities and cooking stove manufacturers knew for decades that burners could be made that emit less pollution in homes, but they chose not to. That may may be about to change.

The heated debate over regulating gas stoves is really about the burners in those appliances. That’s where natural gas, a fossil fuel, is combusted and air pollution is released into homes.

Four decades ago, the gas industry and appliance manufacturers developed a partial solution for this problem. They created a cleaner and more efficient burner. But you can’t buy ranges with those burners because the industry never manufactured those appliances for sale.

Appliance manufacturers and gas industry allies say there are reasons for that: these burners cost more, are less durable, harder to clean, and they didn’t see consumer demand for them.

But now the industry appears ready to revisit the humble gas burner. The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) is investigating whether gas stoves need tighter regulations to protect human health. One commissioner even left open the possibility of banning sales of new gas stoves.

This week, the Department of Energy (DOE) proposed rules that would require all stoves to be more energy efficient. If approved, more than half the gas cooktop market today wouldn’t qualify under the new requirements, according to the DOE. The proposed regulations would take effect for sales of new stoves in 2027.

Even if the federal government only tightens regulations on gas stoves, that would boost efforts from climate activists who want Americans to switch from gas to electric appliances and heaters. Studies from Princeton University, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and the National Academy of Sciences, find that zeroing out greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S. by 2050 will require electrifying buildings, making appliances more efficient, and powering them mostly with emission-free sources like renewable energy.

A cleaner burner, but without a blue flame

In the 1980s indoor air quality was in the news, and the CPSC was taking aim at another home appliance that burns fossil fuels: kerosene heaters. Sales were increasing, and regulators grew concerned, because the heaters emitted harmful pollution into homes, mainly nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide.

The EPA says both pollutants can cause breathing problems, especially for people with asthma. And nitrogen dioxide, at higher levels and over longer periods, may contribute to developing asthma.

The natural gas industry saw regulators’ interest and worried the CPSC might come for gas cooking stoves next, according to a 1984 Science News article. That prompted two industry research groups to begin working on burner improvements.

Out of that process emerged a “jet-powered infrared gas-range burner.”

Instead of the iconic blue flame that you normally see at a gas stove, the infrared burner had “a flat ceramic plate… honeycombed with window-screen-like perforations,” according to the article. Air and fuel burned as they were sent across the plate and ignited bright red in a way that makes the flame itself difficult to see.

This infrared burner consumed about 40% less natural gas to reach cooking temperatures and emitted 40% less nitrogen oxides. The Science News article said designers touted another benefit of the infrared burner: a kitchen stays cooler because more energy goes into the cooking vessel instead of the room.

A Pennsylvania-based stove manufacturer, Caloric Corporation, expressed interest in the infrared burner. That company is no longer in business and was absorbed into Whirlpool Corporation, which did not respond to multiple inquiries about why the burner was never offered in retail stoves.

Another company involved in developing the infrared burner, Thermo Electron Corporation, is now called Thermo Fisher Scientific. A spokesperson says the company couldn’t speak to the infrared burner development, and that the process might have been led by an independent researcher.

The days of paying $6 for a burner on a $7,000 range may be over.

“I’m sure the cost of that burner was probably significantly more than the existing technology,” says Frank Johnson, research and development manager at GTI Energy in Des Plaines, Ill. The non-profit organization used to be called the Gas Technology Institute and is a research group closely tied to the gas industry.

Johnson says he doesn’t know exactly how much more the burners would cost, because the, “technology has never been fully developed into a working range burner.”

Kitchen range makers, such as Wolf, do offer infrared burners for charbroilers and griddles but not for stovetop or oven burners. Sub-Zero Group, which owns Wolf, did not respond to NPR’s questions.

Johnson delivered a warning to high-end manufacturers at an industry conference in Minneapolis last September, according to a recording of the event NPR had access to: “The days of paying $6 for a burner on a $7,000 range may be over.”

Gas utilities are under pressure

Both stove manufacturers and gas utilities face increasing scrutiny as scientific evidence accumulates that shows having a gas stove in the home may affect health, especially for children and people with breathing problems.

Nitrogen dioxide is the big concern for health experts these days. Because of nitrogen dioxide emissions, the American Public Health Association labels gas cooking stoves “a public health concern,” and the American Medical Association warns that cooking with gas increases the risk of childhood asthma.

A recent peer-reviewed paper found that more than 12.7% “of current childhood asthma in the U.S. is attributable to gas stove use.” The gas utility industry pushed back on this latest study, which was funded by RMI, an environmental organization that encourages people to switch from gas to electric appliances.

“Organizations that are making these allegations are relying on reports that did not test natural gas stoves and have ignored research that found no association between gas stoves and asthma,” wrote American Gas Association (AGA) President Karen Harbert in a statement to NPR.

The AGA often tries to equate emissions from fossil fuel combustion to cooking fumes. Harbert pointed to research GTI Energy conducted last year, which compared electric and gas stoves and showed, “no difference in their particulate emissions.”

But particulate emissions from cooking are different from combustion emissions that come with burning natural gas. And when members of the industry talk amongst themselves, they are much clearer about that distinction.

In a presentation two years ago, the AGA’s Ted Williams cautioned colleagues not to discuss ventilation of combustion emissions, because not everyone with a gas stove has a hood that vents outdoors.

“[G]as cooking does generate indoor air emissions of contaminants, including carbon monoxide, oxides of nitrogen, trace amounts of materials such as formaldehyde and so forth,” said Williams in the 2020 webinar material provided to NPR. At the time, Williams was AGA’s senior director for codes and standards.

“But recognizing that, it’s not an issue that’s going to be easy to paper over, because… these products do have emissions,” said Williams.

Consumers aren’t aware of gas stove hazards

For nitrogen dioxide, specifically, the EPA recommends reducing exposure by installing and using over a gas stove an exhaust fan that’s vented outdoors. But that message isn’t reaching consumers.

“There isn’t much information available for people about the potential health risks of using a gas stove or the need for ventilation,” says Matt Casale, director of environment campaigns at the United States Public Interest Research Group (US PIRG).

It’s 40 years of potential cases of asthma and missed school days and missed workdays that potentially could have been avoided

His organization surveyed 39 stores in 10 states to learn what customers are told about health effects of cooking with gas. Casale says a few sales staff did mention that they’d heard of indoor air quality issues with gas ranges and a push toward electric appliances. But that was only after they were specifically asked about the problem.

Casale says the CPSC missed an opportunity to address this issue and regulate gas cooking stoves in the 1980s.

“It’s 40 years of potential cases of asthma and missed school days and missed workdays that potentially could have been avoided,” he says. But he’s pleased to see the commission now “doing its job” by opening an information-gathering process that could lead to new regulations on gas stoves.

When Consumer Product Safety Commission member Richard Trumka, Jr. talked with US PIRG in December about “Pollution-free cooking for the holidays,” he spent time detailing the growing body of scientific evidence that shows emissions from gas cooking stoves can be harmful.

It was only after that he said, “That’s why I think we need to be talking about regulating gas stoves, whether that’s drastically improving emissions or banning gas stoves entirely.”

Then a few weeks later, Trumka said the same thing to Bloomberg. That’s when conservative politicians took up the issue, and it became part of the culture war.

CPSC Chair Alexander Hoehn-Saric wrote on Twitter, “I am not looking to ban gas stoves and the @USCPSC has no proceeding to do so.”

Still, Hoehn-Saric wrote, “CPSC is researching gas emissions in stoves and exploring new ways to address health risks.” But that did little to quell the uproar.

An industry effort to reduce pollution from stoves… again

Amid the kerfuffle, gas stove manufacturers and gas utilities appear to have a renewed interest in exploring cleaner burners for gas stoves.

“The design of cooking equipment has not changed a lot over time. But it’s starting to change now, and it’s just going to take time for those to become… available,” GTI Energy’s Johnson says.

At upcoming trade shows, Johnson says many of his meetings and conversations will be focused on improving gas burner designs.

“There is a strong possibility to do things like improve the efficiency, improve the controls, improve the characteristics,” Johnson says. “And if you’re going to do that, of course, you’re also going to improve the emissions.”

Individual manufacturers, including Whirlpool and Wolf, didn’t respond to NPR’s questions. The trade group Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers says it’s likely appliance makers didn’t adopt the infrared burners from 40 years ago because they’re more expensive and the ceramic plates that glow red break.

Also, since consumers weren’t aware of air quality issues, reducing emissions from gas cooking is not something they asked for in a stove.

Instead, AHAM says manufacturers focused on what consumers want: gas ranges that are easier to clean and more powerful. To address cooking and combustion emissions, the association has focused on standards for adequate ventilation above ranges. AHAM also says a new set of voluntary standards for nitrogen dioxide emissions from gas stoves is in the works.

But that’s not enough for critics like Amneh Minkara of the Sierra Club, who doesn’t trust the industry to implement voluntary standards.

“It’s been 40 years since they first realized that there was a safer alternative,” Minkara says. “I think if they’re going to act, they’re going to have to be forced to act. And I think it’s the job of the regulators to make that happen.”

The CPSC says it will start its “request for information” process on March 1st. While moving from that to developing actual regulations can be a long process, Commissioner Trumka told the US PIRG in December that “with enough public pressure, it doesn’t have to be – we could get a regulation on the books before this time next year.”

Source: vermontpublic